What is it that makes the vagina a shear delight and addiction (like breasts) to look at. What really got me is looking at Georgia O'keeffe. She made her point about the female anatomny looking exactly like what mother nature uses to entice the opposite sex. The similarites are too canny and makes me thing just how universial is the biology of the attraction and the biology of attraction. It makes the vagina so elegant and natural and beautiful. Something that can be seen (though not always through commercialisation and mass production of cheap porn) through art and photography, exspecially through quality photography.
In contrast, a man's penis is, to me, more of a symbolic aspect of the human sexuality and is not as say, artistic or beautiful as a flower. It more stands as a symbol of strength or empowerment and can be seen as a phaylic symbol everywhere you look. So, to me, being a man, is that in comparison the female anatomny (as any artist or photographer can testify) is in a field of beauty, exspecially when it comes to the genitaila.
A women's vagina is a universal symbol and idol of attraction and a beauty that is a biological in it's construction and form. How the soft colored blush petals open up in folds with first the sepal then the inner petals. The extension of the stigma, protruding at the top of the style. It really makes one think of Mother Nature's construction of such basic beauty. So, do we feel some discomfort when seeing it, why has, at least american morality, has distained it to being wrong, to be bad and to be avoided and put out of mind. It is then, abused and the imagery is cheapened, (not in all pornogphy). Different views and different variations of quality and meaning to such a basic part of the female body.